Comments:

Visitor 109601

02/07/2009

Chile vs Peru, oh who cares! I, for one, appreciate all the photos and videos of your trip to Chile and Peru, Mr Hazle. I have been to Machu Picchu and it is place I will never forget. Same goes for Cuzco. Chile is different to Peru, more modern and without the old Inca history, the ruins and lost cities. But Chile also has many if not more beautiful places to see from North to South - although apparently you didn't go too far outside Santiago so you may have missed the best. But thank you for sharing your pictures.

Visitor 43375

02/16/2008

I agree 100% w/ visitor 10558 - PERU is One of a kind ! Peru AKA "The Land of The Incas" can not be mixed up - This will only favor Chileans who do not get any the kind of tourism Peru does. I` ve been to Chile and really they have nothing but stolen names if not find out why chilean are investing so much money in Peru. It will be nice if you change the title of this video Peruvian and Chileans (Mapochos) in reality do not get along very well.

waynehazle

07/27/2007

And it will take you 2 seconds to look at the title of my video and see that it is both Chile AND Peru. I took a trip to both countries and there are people and pictures from both countries there. maybe a little more from Peru, but both are represented. Apology accepted ;)

Visitor 10558

07/27/2007

Cuzco has nothing to do with Chile, neither most of the pictures you show on this video. It would be better not to mix things up. It only contributes to confusion. The peoples from Cuzco, former Incas Capital are Quechuas. They have nothing to do with Chilean's native tribes! Chile has its own beauties, so no need to include Chile's name on a Clips that shows mostly Peruvian Sites.